Sunday, 6 December 2015

Groundwater: The Solution to Climate Change?

As seen in previous blogs, freshwater resources and people will be highly affected by climate change.  As temperatures increase, there will be an increase in evapotranspiration, leading to a high loss of surface water resources, especially in dry areas.  People in semi-arid and arid countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are highly susceptible to changing patterns of freshwater availability.  However, groundwater may be the solution to all climate change problems, as it is highly available in aquifers.  This blog aims to assess groundwater as a barrier against climate change impacts, such as droughts.

Groundwater in Sub-Saharan Africa is estimated to occupy a volume of approximately 0.66 million  km3 of freshwater.  North Africa contains a large amount of Sub-Saharan’s groundwater storage, as Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Algeria and Chad contain the largest aquifers of the region (MacDonald et al 2012).  Furthermore, the Saharan region consists of large areas where groundwater recharge occurred almost 5000 years ago, even though no recharge occurs at present (MacDonald et al 2012). Hence, although Sub-Saharan Africa is relatively dry, there are large underground resources (Figure 1).   Thus, as precipitation events will occur less frequently and intensification of extreme events such as droughts will occur, there will be an increase of groundwater reliance.  These resources could be exploited for the provision of the domestic and agricultural water needs of people.



Figure 1: Groundwater storage for Sub-Saharan Africa
SourceMacDonald et al 2012


Groundwater could be a great solution, especially since the Millennium Development Goals (MDG), which consisted of the provision of clean and safe water for people to alleviate diseases.  This would also eliminate poverty as there would be enough water available for food production.   According to the data of 2012, 300 million people in Africa had no access to safe drinking water and a high proportion of the population was considered poor (MacDonald et al 2012). Hence, highlighting the importance of groundwater as a resource of exploitation. 

Problems

Nonetheless, if groundwater is exploited without adequate sustainability measures taken, the source will slowly diminish to an extent where people will be unable to use it.  As groundwater recharge will not occur as frequently and there will be an increase in demand of groundwater leading to diminishing groundwater resources (Carter and Parker 2009).  As it is expected that population will increase by more than half a billion, by 2050 this suggests that more people will need access to water resources (Taylor et al 2009).  Hence, with an increase in demand for food production and sanitary health, groundwater demand will increase substantially, especially in urbanised areas (Taylor et al 2009).  This may lead to overexploitation of groundwater resources, questioning for how long groundwater will be available if no substantial groundwater recharge occurs.  However, this may be highly variable, as there is not a lot of observed data sets of groundwater resources.  Therefore, there is high uncertainty of how groundwater recharge may be impacted by climate change impacts (Taylor et al 2009).

Another, issue may be that some of the groundwater is very deep and thus it is hard to pump out and it is away from remote areas, hence leading to high costs (Figure 2) (MacDonald et al 2012).  There may be a barrier in the ability of pumping groundwater from deep aquifers, as a high proportion of the population lives in deprived conditions and do not have the economic ability to invest in mechanical pumps of high power.  Moreover, many governments may not be able to provide large power pumps across the whole country to distribute the water (MacDonald et al 2012).  Thus unfortunately some areas will be unable to exploit groundwater resources to the desired degree.  Controversially, Taylor et al 2009 argue that groundwater infrastructure is relatively cheap compared to surface water infrastructure and maintenance of groundwater resources are cheaper, hence questioning to what degree this will limit the ability of people to abstract groundwater from deep aquifers.


Figure 2: Aquifer productivity for Africa. The inset shows an approximate depth to groundwater (Bonsor and MacDonald 2011)
Source
MacDonald et al 2012
Additionally, a problem may arise, if there is an increase in technological advancement and there are relatively no regulations.  People, may pump too much water and overexploit groundwater resources as they become wealthier (Carter and Parker 2009).  If groundwater recharge is lower than groundwater abstraction, this will lead to groundwater level declining and decreasing groundwater availability.   Carter and Parker argue that groundwater recharge best occurs in medium intensity rainfall.  Therefore, intensification in precipitation events may not provide the aspired groundwater recharge, leading to diminishing groundwater availability.

Lastly, many aquifers may be transbourdary, meaning they are beneath more than one country.  Hence, this creates hydropolitical issues (Taylor et al 2009).  As there is an increase in groundwater demand, due to increased climatic changes, there may be an issue of who uses the water and who gets a substantial degree of the groundwater source.  For instance increased groundwater abstraction in one nation may not allow rivers to be regenerated due to baseflow hence affecting a transboundary river. This may lead to many disagreements between nations and even wars.

Conclusion



With increasing climate change impacts this increases groundwater reliance.  Groundwater use combined with a technological advancement, is highly essential for the prosperity of the people.  However, if groundwater is overexploited it is questionable to what degree groundwater will be available and for how long.   Although groundwater may be a solution to climate change for a certain period of time, this does not mean groundwater will always be available to people.  Hence emphasising the importance of trying to monitor groundwater abstraction through government regulations to mitigate climate change impacts.

8 comments:

  1. Hey,
    this is a great Blog! You summarize everything and cover not only Groundwater assets but also the problems and possible adaptations. For the last part you could might suggest the outcomes of the 2009 paper of Richard Taylor summarizing the 2008 Groundwater and Climate Conference in Kampala. There he described the use of stabil isotope tracers and gases to keep records of recharge even though the actual conference didn´t really achieve its aims it was still a first step into the right direction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey! Thank you for your lovely comment and your suggestions. I will look into the paper you have proposed.

      Delete
  2. I think what you highlighted well here is that adequate prediction of both 1) the physical impact of climate change on groundwater resources 2) the adaptability of its usage as largely inhibited by the lack of monitoring and research undertaking in Africa. Maybe international organisations should focus on making is easier and cheaper for communities to monitor their groundwater resource for better, secure future management? What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Loulou! Thank you for your comment! I agree better management and monitoring in Africa is essential in preserving groundwater resources for better and secure management. However, I believe it is very hard to achieve this, as in many cases it may require high levels of knowledge and training of people to have the ability to monitor groundwater and secure its management. So, yes international organisations could make it easier and cheaper for groundwater monitoring however, a high level of understanding is essential for people to know when to stop or constrain their water use. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Maria! I really enjoyed reading this post - it summarises the debates surrounding groundwater usage really well! I found it interesting that Carter and Parker (2009) argue groundwater recharge occurs best with medium intensity rainfall - I've been doing research on the impacts of an intensified hydrological cycle on groundwater and there seems to be lot's of more recent evidence (e.g. Taylor et al., 2013) that actually very intense extreme rainfall is best for groundwater recharge. Do you think that under a possibility of increased groundwater recharge perhaps measures for monitoring groundwater abstraction may be less necessary? Or should it still be high on the agenda?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Shruti! Thank you for your comment! The views of Carter and Parker compared to Taylor et al 2013 may vary for various reasons, the most obvious one being a difference in geology of areas. I believe that groundwater abstraction monitoring should be high on the agenda whether groundwater recharge increases or not. With an increasing population and a constant increase in agricultural crops abstraction is always necessary. Hence although groundwater recharge may be increasing this does not mean that abstraction rates will be lower than groundwater recharge. Although highly correlated, it is important to acknowledge that water demand has many other factors to take into consideration (i.e. people, industry, agriculture) and not only water availability which may be induced by groundwater recharge. I hope this answers your question!

      Delete
  5. Hi Maria! Very informative post - thanks for sharing!
    I am interested in solutions to one of the issues you mentioned, overexploitation of groundwater, such as assignation of abstraction rights, educational programs and 'technical' solutions. As regards the last one, do you think there are particularly efficient indigenous techniques or types of pumps? And, in general, would you consider any of the above mentioned solutions more advisable? Thanks in any case, even if you don't have time to answer!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Greta, Thank you for your comment! I believe all solutions can be vital for limiting overexploitation of groundwater. I believe education is essential in terms of people understanding why they need to limit their pumpage use. However, I also feel this will not be enough of an incentive for them to completely become efficient when using water. Hence, I believe that a combination of all factors would be the most effective way of decreasing groundwater overexploitation. I think abstraction rights or charges (through metering) could be highly effective as it creates an disincentive for people to abstract water as they will be charged according to the amount they use. Nonetheless, people may riot and act against these policies without education. I believe an increase in technology may be efficient in terms of using water more efficiently. However, people may not understand why they should spend this money if they have no education on the matter. Concluding, an implementation of as many processes as possible will help reduce overexploitation. I hope this answers your question!

      Delete